Thursday, October 16, 2014

Wiki-Right Or Wiki-Wrong?

        Wikipedia is a well-known database of information on topics that vary from history to current events. Although Wikipedia is very well known, it’s sources are not always trust worthy. Because so many people have access to Wikipedia, the edits that are made on some of the pages may not be correct. Wikipedia claims to be an online encyclopedia, but with random people adding facts to their pages, it is hard for users to trust this information. Essentially, yes, there is a team of people who try to keep track of the edits and make sure that they are true. But with so many users and changes, it is hard for them to keep track of everything. I believe that Corbett, Eberly and Lazarre would all agree that Wikipedia could be the ultimate platform for citizen critics seeing as anyone can edit articles. Wikipedia claims they have editors with diverse backgrounds, but how can we, as users, know if that it true or not. Another interesting fact about Wikipedia is the way the overall website is organized. While there is a search box, the home page gives the viewer many articles to choose from to begin their searches.
        Wikipedia does state on their “About Wikipedia” page, “Wikipedia is written collaboratively by largely anonymous Internet volunteers who write without pay. Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles, except in limited cases where editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism. Users can contribute anonymously, under a pseudonym, or, if they choose to, with their real identity.” This is what makes users skeptical of using information off their site.
        After looking through a bunch of Wikipedia articles on the “Did you know…” page, I came across one about Dascha Polanco, an actress from Orange Is The New Black, and found her background story very interesting. The difficult part of this article was that there were a lot of articles from news sites, but most were in Spanish, thus I couldn’t understand if these facts were true or not. There was also some articles from bigger named sites, such as NBC. While looking through those, I found that all the information on her page seemed true. Some of the sources are from smaller news sites, and while I don’t think that makes them “unreliable” it does make me question them a tad.
        Of the sources I checked out, all agreed with the fact that she is from the Dominican and raised in Brooklyn and Miami. All the articles also stated that this job on OITNB was her first acting job. Lastly, they all also confirm that she was working to become a nurse after college. I do think this information is generally reliable, but with some of the articles being in Spanish, I could not confirm those. There was not much detail on her page, seeing as she just became famous, but of the information provided it all seemed to be true to her life. This is just one example of Wikipedia being correct. There are surely many examples of Wikipedia having incorrect information on it, I was just lucky enough to pick something that was all true.

Cites:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dascha_Polanco

Corbett, Edward P.J., and Rosa A. Eberly. “Becoming a Citizen Critic: Where Rhetoric Meets the Road.” The Elements of Reading. 121-138. Web. 



No comments:

Post a Comment